91% and 32%. The first is the O-1A approval rate this year; the second is where the EB-1A now stands.The evaluation results for O1A and EB1A have been just about the same this year: the same type of claims for those “extraordinary abilities” – the same officials looking through similar proofs. The odds, though, are different. The EB-1A approval rate 2026 is the lowest the category has seen. I can tell you a story about a person I call A. She is a machine learning engineer with 8 years of experience, a few patents, a few speeches in conferences, and a place as a reviewer in a journal of decent rank. At the beginning of 2026, she sent an application for EB1A, which she thought would be fine, only to get a refusal letter saying the information she provided did not prove that she is “the best in this field.’ A few months later, her attorney obtained approval for her O1A application based on the same documentation that had been subject to the denial in the EB1A case.
Same criteria, different bar
At first glance, they seem quite similar. Both require you to meet at least three conditions from a long list: awards, membership in associations, media publicity, judging others’ work, original contributions, writing articles, and making a major contribution to the field at a high remuneration level. They actually share most of the information. That overlap is why O-1A vs EB-1A is the first comparison most applicants make.
However, it is important to note what happens next.
In the case of EB1A, after fulfilling the conditions, the USCIS carries out the so-called final merits review, according to Kazarian. Three criteria represent only the first step. This allows the officer to assess whether you actually belong to a category of people with outstanding achievements in your field of study or work. In 2026, the success of a sufficient number of cases seems to be unsatisfactory. The rising EB-1A denial rate reflects how strictly this step is being applied.
The O1A is a fleeting visa, linking it to a primary occupation. While officials should take all available evidence into account, the actual review has become more of a matter of the straightforward fulfillment of the requirements and whether a valid position is offered. That is a big reason the O-1A approval rate has stayed so high.
To put it in my favourite words: the O1A curiosity is, “ Are you good enough for this job here?” and the EB1A says, “ Are you good enough to stay with us forever?” That one difference explains most of the gap in the extraordinary ability visa 2026 numbers.

The two-step strategy
So here is what everybody seems to be doing this year without making any noise. It is a quiet response to the EB-1A approval rate record low.
Step one: Go for O1A now. It allows you to work up to a period of three years with extensions thereafter. There is no lottery involved. The O-1A provides no downside when it comes to obtaining a green card in the future. This is why the O-1A visa for founders has become such a popular starting point.
Step two: Apply for EB1A after your record is at the stage when you are ready to do that. You are in the U.S., doing your work, gaining experience. Each presentation, each publication, each “ we shipped this and here is what changed” episode becomes a part of your evidence. When you apply for EB1A, you do not have to make your record sound impressive. You just present the facts. With USCIS approval rates FY2026 this far apart, that timing matters.
| Category | FY2025 | Q1 FY26 | Q2 FY26 | Q3 FY26 |
| EB-1A | 66.9% | 47.4% | 41.7% | 32.2% |
| O-1 | 93.9% | 91.0% | 91.2% | 91.0% |
| EB-2 NIW | 55.2% | 42.6% | 48.1% | 55.3% |
It is like a band that has not won a Grammy but goes on a tour. You do not need a Grammy for it; you do the tour first, and then there comes the Grammy.
Let me mention one important point: the O1A is not a guarantee of EB-1A approval. However, having two or three years of relevant impact allows for a very different conversation. Even after an O-1A approval, the EB-1A approval rate 2026 reminds us that the green card bar is judged on its own.
When the O-1A is the wrong move
While I appreciate the two-step process, I don’t think it works for everyone. There are several groups of people for whom this process might not be of value:
- You already have a record with lots of awards, good media coverage, and a sufficient amount of work that has been cited, and securing the priority date is more important than waiting and wasting time on a two-step process.
- You belong to countries such as China or India, where the question of the backlog of applications matters a lot, and speeding up the entire immigration process is crucial for you.
- Your research may fit better with the EB2 process, as it is appropriate for people who can prove that their work serves the U.S. interests rather than that they belong to the audience of top experts. Here, the EB-1A vs EB-2 NIW approval rate comparison is worth checking.
- You don’t have a U.S. employer or agent. The O-1A needs a petitioner. EB-1A and NIW let you self-petition.
- You’re already secure on another visa. If you’re comfortable on H-1B or L-1, adding an O-1A step may just add paperwork.

What to build while you’re on O-1A
This is the enjoyable portion. You will be able to transform an excellent case to an obvious one during O1A years. For anyone on an O-1A visa for tech professionals, these years are the best chance to strengthen the record. Concentrate on four factors.
Judging
Go through papers, chair hackathon or business competition panels, and read grant proposals. Maintain all your invitations in the mail. Officers appreciate an example for having the opinion of your colleagues.
Speaking
Try to be invited to deliver a speech rather than to present a paper. An invitation to talk at an important industry event is proof that the field has reached you. Leep the agenda of the talk, biography, and recording of the speech.
Publishing
Peer-reviewed articles have their merits, but publishing in known trade publications is also adequate. The most important thing is to have your ideas discussed by colleagues.
Documented Impact
Written proof of accomplishments. This is often the part that most people neglect to cover. Undocumented impact is a frequent reason behind an EB-1A denied without RFE decision. Rather than stating that you “led the council committee,” you should mention that “the solution that I employed resulted in 40% lower fraud losses in addition to being employed successfully by three other committees.” When one claims to have accomplished something, it always pays to obtain confirmation from reputable sources, such as managers of clients or industry experts.
There is a very simple technique that I learned. I always keep a special folder that contains evidence of my achievements, which has proved extremely useful.
Closing note
One challenging EB1A year should not be perceived as the end of the journey. It may just lay down the foundation for successful efforts. It is advisable to advance and document one’s efforts, thus making it easy to move forward. My article should clarify all the requirements for getting the O1A visa, while skilled consultants at EB1A Experts will be glad to provide an assessment of the current situation.
FAQs
Overall, there has been a significant drop in the EB-1A approvals during 2026, with only around 32%. This means that roughly 2/3 of EB-1A petitions are being rejected or not approved initially. This means the EB-1A denial rates are higher than the approval rates. Many of these cases will have had an RFE issued.
O-1A approval rates are currently around 91%. Although the criteria are similar, as they both rely on ‘extraordinary abilities’, the O-1A is treated as a temporary, job-specific visa by USCIS. This generally means fewer surprises at the end.
Mainly due to the Kazarian final merits. Officers are using this much more strictly and looking to ensure that you are truly at the top of your field based on the full file. Common reasons for rejection are a lack of evidence, generic recommendation letters, and no proof of impact. However, applicants should also review the updated USCIS policy manual August 2026.
Yes, in practice, most people find the O-1A easier to obtain. Although there is a lot of overlap between the criteria, the EB-1A is a permanent green card, so it tends to be stricter when assessed overall. The O-1A is more focused on whether the criteria are clearly met and there is a genuine position available for you to take up. This is the main difference between O-1A and EB-1A.
Yes, O-1A visas are a great way to get towards your green card without risking your status. Many people apply for EB1A after using their years on an O-1A to bolster their profile, and continue working while they wait.
No. They are separate processes with USCIS. EB1A is a higher bar. O1A approval means that you meet the criteria for a temporary visa; however, EB-1A must still pass final merits.
For borderline cases, it can be better to apply for O1A first. This will give you the years to build up your profile with judging, speaking, publications, and evidence of impact. If you have strong evidence, then it could be a better idea to apply for EB1A now. With the EB1A approval rate for 2026, you want to be honest about how your evidence looks.
EB1A asks if you’re an elite in your field. EB2-NIW asks if your work benefits the U.S. This can be a good option for many researchers and founders. Within the EB1 category, there is often a faster processing time compared to EB2. So if you’re from India/China, you may find that the backlog means you should apply for EB1A. When considering the EB1A approval rate vs. EB2-NIW, you should take into account the backlog.