The EB1A visa remains one of the most
distinguished but also one of the most
difficult categories for a
U.S. Green card. Now that we are well into 2025, the EB1A approval
rate 2025 is currently almost 67%
based on the strength of the case and quarterly changing trends at USCIS. The newest data indicates an
increasing level of scrutiny, an increase in RFEs, and increased emphasis on measurable impact. These
changes shape how applicants prepare their applications and who will be successful in the program this
year.
Understanding these trends for those who are preparing to file in 2025 or for those who are looking
ahead to 2026 is invaluable and can profoundly affect the outcome of future applications.
The EB1A is a green card category for individuals with
extraordinary ability who have been recognized
for sustained national or international acclaim.
Who qualifies and how is EB1A different?
Individuals that can demonstrate that they are at top of their field, with plentiful supporting
evidence.
EB1A provides for permanent residency. Whereas an O1A is a non-immigrant visa. NIW is not an
employer-sponsor, but it does have a qualifying criteria at the extraordinary ability level.
3. Why Approval Rates change Year to Year?
Changes in adjudication policies at USCIS
Changes in filing volume
Changes in officer training and internal guidance
By the strength and quality of the evidence presented
Changes in patterns of global high-skilled migration patterns
The latest analysis of USCIS data shows a clear shift in approval rates across all employment
categories. However, the recent data for this year shows an increasingly high level of scrutiny for all
employment-based categories. Nonetheless, thoroughly developed EB1A applications with well-documented
evidence still show a high rate of success. Quality preparation remains the key to a successful
immigration case strategy and, by extension, the outcome.
The statistics for overall EB1A approvals indicate that the USCIS has strict but fair standards. Cases
that present thorough evidence, deliver a clear explanation of an extraordinary achievement, and
strategically provide evidence generally succeed over cases that have less preparation.
5. Understanding the 2025 Approval Landscape
Overall Approval Rate
As of 2025, the EB1A approval has a rate ranging around 67%, Q1 FY 2025 showing a distinct rebound to
63% after the sharp drop in FY 2024. Although approvals continue to recover, the adjudication
environment remains stringent due to backlogs, elevated RFE rates, and a more intense focus on tangible,
independently verifiable impact.
Approvals vs. Denials Trends
The approval patterns in 2025 present a stark dichotomy:
Petitions that are sufficiently prepared continue to have strong approval rates, in particular
those with objective metrics, letters from credible experts, and clearly documented evidence mapping.
Petitions that are less well-prepared are experiencing increased denial rates, primarily
petitions that articulated unrealized achievements or facts and lacked documentation.
RFEs currently are being issued in 40% – 50% of EB-1A filings; however, effective responses to
the RFE continue to record ~60% approval rates demonstrating that the crucial factor is the relative
strength of the evidence not whether a RFE was issued
Year-Over-Year Comparison (2023 → 2024 → 2025)
Data shows that EB-1A adjudication has tightened significantly over the past ten years
Fiscal Year
Approval Rate
FY 2014-2016 (Pre-Trump Era)
87%
FY 2017-2020 (Trump Administration)
80%
FY 2024
43% (steep decline)
Q1 FY 2025
63% (recovery begins)
EB-1As were regularly approved at high (80–87%) rates.
FY 2024 was the most aggressive year for the adjudicator in recent times.
We see a distinct improvement in 2025, but it does not resemble the leniency of 2014–2016 before FY
2017.
Nonetheless, the adjudicator is beginning to recover, but still remains much stricter than in the past
decades.
6. EB1A Success Rates by Area of Practice
The EB1A success rates demonstrated by area of practice show significant variation across professional
fields.
Professional Field
Success Rate Trend
STEM and Technology
High
Scientific Research
High
Business & Entrepreneurship
Moderate
High Arts and entertainment
Moderate
Athletics
Moderate
Academia
High
7. Understanding the 2025 Approval Environment
The EB-1A approval environment for 2025 is influenced by a number of interconnected drivers: rising RFE
rates, more stringent evidentiary review, volume of filings, and approving trends based on country and
industry.
Rising RFE Rates and What they mean?
Perhaps the most compelling development regarding 2025 is the uptick in RFE rates, which now impacts
40-50% of EB-1A applications. And while this rate is not reflective of decreased approval rates, it
suggests a stricter and more nuanced standard for review. In short, applicants have continued to paint
the best picture when responding to RFEs, and can expect a strong outcome of around 60% approval rates
(on par with applicants/applications that never received an RFE). This must mean that RFEs are a request
for clarification because if well-planned and supported, an applicant can still expect approval (at a
rate on par with those who never received an RFE).
8. What is prompting the fluctuations of 2025 Approval Standards?
Better Evidence Interpretation
USCIS individuals are emphasizing extraordinary ability criteria in deeper, richer ways. Applicants are
being required to demonstrate a stronger evidential basis for a measurable impact, independent
recognition, and duration of career. Analysts following the USCIS EB-1A data indicate the cases that
contain vague accomplishments or allegations without backup are the ones under the greatest scrutiny in
this stricter review environment.
Increased Filing Volume
The ebbs and flows of post-pandemic mobility in the global marketplace, particularly as it relates to
U.S. technology, research and innovation sectors, have contributed to an increase in EB-1A filings.
Scientists, technologists, founders, and creatives are filing at remarkable levels resulting in a more
competitive market. This volume is likely to increase scrutiny of evidence affiliated with palpable
accomplishments of individuals.
The Rising RFE Issue
Requests for Evidence (RFE) are appearing more frequently; while extending time frames they are not
necessarily bad. The challenge is to create evidence that responds specifically to the officer's
concerns that are verifiable. Applications that are strong and/or robustly structures, backed by
evidence of meeting criteria, continue to perform remarkably well, irrespective of RFEs, while the
weaker applications typically do not recover after a RFE.
Approval Rates by Industry
Approval rates vary by industry based on available documentation and standard industry practices. In
conversations with fellow experts, our summarized findings are as follows:
Scientific research: The specific research field demonstrated the strongest acceptance
patterns.
Medical (other sciences): Demonstrated the following highest approval rates due to clear
metrics
like peer-reviewed articles and clinical-level innovations.
Creative and performing arts when an applicant can identify their level of national exposure
specifically, did well.
Athletics and sports also continued to demonstrate a strong pattern, as evidenced by their
validation in documenting quantifiable career accomplishments.
Startup founders with funding traction, or reputable accelerators performed primarily firmly
based
on the example documents.
These reflect broader EB-1A approval statistics across diverse professional domains.
9. Trends in EB-1A Approval for Indian Applicants in 2025
More Scrutiny Attention
USCIS is scrutinizing more closely the context and impact of achievement. They are looking for
evidence
that applicants make an impact in their field, not only do good work in their field. This has resulted
in more focus on citation metrics, market or industry adoption, measurable innovation, and the role of
press.
RFE and NOID Rates
The RFEs and NOIDs have changed to now focus on ambiguity, unsupported achievements, and repetition
as
well as weak expert letters. The relatively 'strong' petitions can solve the problems; weak petitions
do
not.
More Emphasis on Measurable Impact
More attention is placed on contract - energy involved, citations made, things helped to change,
clinical outcomes, contributions to outside of previous work or jobs to gain new participation,
revenue
gained (ex.) Professor A led coding innovation; Professor A developed patent goggles to be used in
clinical evaluation to ensure placebo standard; Professor A received money to give to others to apply
or
win at challenge or in biomechanical award programs.
The Role of Premium Processing
Premium processing does allow for faster timelines, but does not lessen expectations. In many
instances, the timeframe of a response is faster, but with more RFEs, rather than a simpler approval
process.
Commonality with Approved Applications
Primarily, the approved cases came with:
Clear mapping of evidence to factors
Independent press and outlet validation
Strong letters from respected authority
Evidence delivered with measurements and impact.
Most Common Reasons for EB-1A Rejections
Inadequate evidence of sustained recognition
Absence of measurable or independently verifiable influence
Lack of third-party verification (media coverage, awards, citations)
Weak or generic expert letters
Poor organization of the narrative, with insufficient basis for extraordinary ability
10. What the Highest Approval Prospective Applicants did differently in 2025?
Approved applicants in 2025 generally had:
Clear detailing of evidence to each criteria
Firm objective metrics supported by verifiable evidence
Independent media and press coverage
An explicit and principled expert letter from a powerful and engaged person or entity
Demonstrated impact on the field and not only success in their profession
Comparing the EB-1A Approval Rates to Other Immigrant Categories
EB-1B: higher approval rates, as applicants received petitionary support from an employer and
the
standards were much stricter.
EB-1C: lower approval rates because of strict multinational manager requirements.
O-1A: higher rates, but non-immigrant; less stringent than EB-1A.
11. How 2025 Trends will impact Prospective Applicants who file in 2025 - 2026?
Predictions
Continued emphasis on objective, data-driven evidence
Increased scrutiny of independent validation
Italian specificity with the RFEs regarding influence and evidence sharing qualifications.
How to Prepare Yourself?
Enhance expert letters
Plan on adding tangible metrics (citations, revenue, adoption, outcomes)
Establish independent press visibility
Get careful about the utility of evidence mapping or visualizations
What is Demonstrated by the Assessment Process?
Quantifiable influence
Meaningful third-party emphasis
Demonstrated capacity for shaping the field
Demonstrated originality or innovation
The EB-1A environment in 2025 has increased scrutiny, more RFEs, and an increased emphasis on
measurable professional impact. Despite the increased review, applicants with a clear, organized
petition – complete with documented quantifiable accomplishments – are continually approved at
significant rates.
As we enter 2026, we can expect the same patterns. In the end, the strongest applicants will be those
who devote time and energy to ensure reliable documentation, credible expert letters, and strategic
evidence presentation.
EB-1A Experts can ensure that someone is
building a petition that meets the
contemporary standards of
USCIS. Our assistance includes individualized strategy, documentation support, and end-to-end
development of your petition.
Promote your evaluation today and enhance your likelihood of EB-1A Approval.
12. FAQs
1. What is the EB-1A approval rate in 2025?
It ranges roughly 55–70% depending on the quarter and case strength (Add 1 more line).
2. Why are approval rates fluctuating this year?
Tighter adjudication standards and increasing filing volumes.
3. Do Indian applicants face lower approval rates?
Slightly lower, mainly due to high competition and evidence gaps—not bias.
4. Which fields have the highest EB-1A success rate?
Sciences, medical research, arts, athletics, and funded startup founders.
5. How do RFEs impact approval rates?
They reduce success primarily when responses are weak or incomplete.